Jurisdictions that ignore DMCA notices: a working 2026 view
DMCA has no force where it is not law. Local criminal process still exists everywhere we rack. Crypto checkout is unrelated.
长文正文为英文。页头、目录与结账已翻译。
How to read a map
Look at: is the company a US person? Is the rack in a country with a US MLAT that gets used as a shortcut? Does the host treat a DMCA email as a kill switch anyway to keep an upstream happy? A host that takes Visa will often pull a VM to protect the merchant account even when the statute does not apply. Crypto-only billing removes that merchant-account pressure. It does not remove local criminal law.
Our four
Iceland and Switzerland are the speech and privacy brands. Romania is EU-but-retention-light. Netherlands is peering-first. Company domicile in Saint Kitts and Nevis is the contract layer, separate from where the RAM sits. You pay the same Bitcoin or Monero invoice in all four.
What 'ignore' does not mean
It does not mean CSAM, malware C2, or phishing kits. It means a US copyright form letter is logged and closed rather than used as a remote power button.
Is DMCA-ignored the same as anything-goes?
No. See the AUP.
Does paying with crypto change the DMCA stance?
No. The stance is corporate and jurisdictional. The coin is billing.
Network
Edge RTT
Uptime · 36h
Complaints · 36h